Lucidity
Letter 7(1), 1988
Book
Reviews
Speaking of Silence: Christians and
Buddhists on the
Reviewed
by
This book began as a stack of verbatim transcripts
documenting five conferences that were hosted by Naropa
Institute in
Both traditions seem to hold in high regard such
traits as humility, compassion, and simplicity.
Both value transcendence; both allow the inevitability of death to
motivate their actions; and there may even be a similarity between the Buddhist "void" and the Christian "dark night
of the soul." Their differences are
not so well articulated; sometimes it appears as if a deliberate attempt has
been made to mute obvious differences.
For example, there is a consensus that sin implies disharmony and
disruption -- but the Christian image of sinners cast into hell is never
evoked. There is a thoughtful discussion
regarding the appropriateness of celibacy in monastic settings, but the Roman
Catholic dogma limiting sexual behavior to marriage remains unquestioned.
Dreams are mentioned twice -- both negatively. A Christian spokesperson advises, "if you have a dream, don't follow it.... The voice of the devil and the voice of one's
own nature speak all the time, and it is easy to be
misled" (p. 57). A Buddhist
representative recalls a saying, "All dharmas
should be regarded as dreams" (p. 196); in other words, one should
beware illusion and delusion. The idea
that working with dreams might contribute to a person's spiritual growth is
completely absent.
One highlight of the book, for me, was a perceptive
differentiation between one's "superego" and one's
"conscience," the former representing the punitive voice of
externally imposed value systems of authority figures, the latter representing
one's basic spiritual nature. I also was
impressed by a delineation of the hallmarks of saintly people (which included
zest for life, passion, hilarity, contemplation, and human frailty). I enjoyed discussions of the Buddhist
emphasis on personal experience as the ultimate authority, and a Christian
spokesperson's description of the role emotion can play in spirituality.
The major participants in these conferences included
four Roman Catholics, two Eastern Orthodox priests, one Anglican, one Quaker,
but no representatives of mainline Protestant denominations. Of the Buddhists, eight were members of
Tibetan lineages and two were Zen pracitioners. There were no Chrisian
equivalents to the eminent Dalai Lama and Chogyam Trumpa. Only three
of the spokespeople were women. Although
these individuals can hardly be called a representative sample of
contemplatives, they were exceptionally articulate. Their talks, discussions, and dialogues are
interesting to read -- and often inspirational.
One can conjecture what would occur if a future conference brought
together Moslem and Jewish (or Hindu) spokespeople to discuss their spiritual
values.